Homosexuality and the Bible

 

IT'S NOT NATURAL!


In Romans 1:26-27, St. Paul talks of men and women giving up natural intercourse and being consumed with passion for each other.  Is homosexuality seen as being unnatural because it is supposedly against the laws of nature or because it's against God's perfect creation?  There is a danger of understanding what is natural in terms of what is customary in a given society.  In some societies it is considered unnatural to wear clothes.

It is against the laws of nature for humanity to fly.  It is natural that there is pain in childbirth.  Paul says it is unnatural for men to have long hair (1 Corinthians 11:14), but the laws of nature dictate otherwise.

Some argue that God created male and female as a means of procreation, the sexual organs are determined by nature and their natural use must not be 'perverted'.  Homosexuality is condemned because it is not procreative.  Those who use this to condemn us call us to be celibate.  Should women be celibate after menopause?  It is dangerous to argue solely from biology when discussing God's desires for humanity.

When reading Romans 1:26-27 consider, "is there a distinction between naturally heterosexual people turning towards same sex relationships, for what ever reason, and those who are 'naturally' homosexual?"

IT'S AN ABOMINATION!


"You shall not lie with a male as with a women; it is an abomination." (Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13).  These passages appear within the Holiness Code of Israel.  The Holiness Code is concerned with keeping Israel pure and untainted by the surrounding nations whose ways, it was felt, would lead them away from God.  An abomination is that which God found detestable because it was unclean, disloyal and unjust.  The word appears six times in the Holiness Code, always with reference to sexual impurity.   In the book of Ezekiel the word appears several times, where it is associated with idolatry.

The Hebrew religion stood in continuous tension with the religions of the surrounding Canaanites who worshipped the multiple gods of the fertility cults.  Sexual intercourse (as cult prostitution) was a regular feature of the pagan worship.  In having sex, devotees re-enacted the relationship of their God with the land.  Homoerotic encounters were part of the many pagan cults and therefore Israel distanced herself from them.  Christians today do not follow the other laws found in the Holiness Code (the wearing of clothes with two kinds of materials, for example).  We are however aware of actions that may lead us away from God.  Homosexual acts are no longer seen as part of pagan worship.  Cult prostitution is condemned in Leviticus, such condemnation should not be applied to loving, respectful, same-sex relationships.


WHAT ABOUT SODOM?


"Behold, this was the sin of your sister, Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease but did not aid the poor and needy." (Ezekiel 16:49).  There are three possible reasons for the destruction of Sodom: general wickedness, as shown in the opening quote; inhospitality, in a world where inns were a rarity travellers were dependant on the goodwill of strangers not just for their comfort but for their survival (see Deuteronomy 23:3-4) and homosexual intercourse.

"Bring them out that we might know them."  These are the words the men of Sodom said of the strangers in their town.  And Lot offered his virgin daughters to the crowd.  If the men of Sodom were all homosexual, why would Lot offer his daughters?  If the men (and women) of Sodom were intent on homosexual intercourse it would have constituted gang rape.  Gang rape, under any moral code, would justify divine displeasure.  In the ancient Middle East male rape was a way of expressing the lowest form of contempt.  In the then culture anal sex meant that one partner had to play the passive role of a woman, thus making oneself worthless.   From Lot's reaction we can already see how valued women are!

Jesus says nothing at all about homosexuality but he does talk about Sodom in terms of hospitality (Matthew 10:15).  Nowhere does the Bible say that Sodom was destroyed because of homosexuality.



WHAT ABOUT WOMEN THEN!


The Bible has been the source for those who believe that homosexuality is a sin or a sickness, but on the subject of lesbianism it is silent.  Lesbians are treated along with gay men when the account of Sodom is used against homosexuality.  Were women part of the crowd that wanted to have sex with the angels?  If so, this further illustrates that the sin was rape, and then not only same-sex rape.  A parallel story to that of Sodom is found in Judges 19.  To appease the crowd the man's concubine is thrown out to them and raped and abused until life is squeezed out of her.


It is easy to see why the Bible may be seen, not as bringing God's liberating love, but as a tool of oppression, which in places condemns gay men to die and approves the rape of women as being less sinful than the rape of men.  Male homosexuality was looked down upon because one man had to lower himself to the status of women.   Women are regarded as possessions to be used and abused.  This attitude is not acceptable in the 21st Century.  The Bible contains the word of God alongside the words of men.  We must apply the tools of modern scholarship to distinguish between the two.


Homosexuality is portrayed variously as either a sin or a sickness according to biblical interpretation.  In fact, the Bible is virtually silent on the subject of homosexuality and is generally positive on the whole subject of sexual expression.  Sexual relationships that involve power over and the debasement of the individual are condemned.

For a further exploration of the Bible and sexuality please click below.